magnetisation/form
so at the end
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
which magnetises chains of pins
you cannot feed someone truth
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
no i haven't really read anything
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
no like which do people call me
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
we can only engage in such a way
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
its good short few pages
send your tumblr
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
isaac newton
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
its good
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
the site i am dreaming
theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine
December 2025
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
was it worth it
lol yea