magnetisation/form

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

division of reality is straying away from it

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

ahnaf abrar

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

is this you as well

what do you think my name is

yeah

send your tumblr

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

what do you mean

thank you

your feed looks like my tumblr

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i love it here

yeah

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

2 (actually index). two is company

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

hello reader,

bro i read nothing in my life

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

December 2025

have you read

so at the end

was it worth it