fw

all that is to say

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

yeah

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

i have read not even 1 book

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

magnetisation/form

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i really havent

was it worth it

thank you

sorry i am texting like a slav

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models