mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

sorry i am texting like a slav

no i haven't really read anything

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

its good

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

all that is to say

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

propensity within someone

i dont understand magnetisation

its good

have you read

magnetisation/form

god being the centre magnet

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

autonomy of learning

plato

much more tactility

that looks like my instagram account

i have read not even 1 book

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

we can only engage in such a way

so i or you can author smaller fragments that get arranged

feel you

Better Lift

plato

yes

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

lol

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt