this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
much more tactility
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
as in
you cannot feed someone truth
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
propensity within someone
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
so at the end
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
so an active mazelike process
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
was it worth it
i really havent
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
not their contents
Maybe, Jack, I'm doing this because I'm English?
idk
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
Thank you for telling me that I'm failing to see how I'm reproducing the dynamics I'm trying to critique by only describing my Korean colleague / fresh meat and the black girl in relation to others and myself.