its good

have you read

not their contents

like first name

we can only engage in such a way

much more tactility

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

which magnetises chains of pins

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i was tempted to lie about my name

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

all that is to say

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

autonomy of learning

plato

plato

was it worth it

i dont understand magnetisation

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

god being the centre magnet

no i haven't really read anything

propensity within someone

magnetisation/form

like magnets

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

abrar?

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

you cannot feed someone truth

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

isaac

its good