i understand
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
much more tactility
fw
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
yeah
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
we can only engage in such a way
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
no i haven't really read anything
as in
its good
ion
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
plato
its performative
plato
ahnaf abrar
the textwall is as much for me as it is for you
feel you
i was tempted to lie about my name
and the fake qualifier
was it worth it
that is unstable and lets me operate in that discovery mode that i can create within and also produce works from.
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.