i dont understand magnetisation

yeah

as in

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

so at the end

so the method has to be autonomous

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

so an active mazelike process

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

you cannot feed someone truth

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them


The bird dives back into the tree. It shakes, some leaves fall.

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying


propensity within someone

I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

much more tactility

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

plato

its good

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17