i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
which magnetises chains of pins
magnetises a pin
abrar?
so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities
thank you
plato
so the method has to be autonomous
what do you mean
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its good
its performative
we need to be deconstructing our identities
autonomy of learning
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
its good
i understand
and the fake qualifier
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
so an active mazelike process
yeah
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
all that is to say
...
much more tactility