we can only engage in such a way
so at the end
I wonder if she knew I was down there listening? I wonder if she would've said something more true, more personal, more raw, more heartfelt, more harsh, more seductive, more freeing, more exposing, more risky, more romantic, more rude, more honest, more anything, if there hadn't been an audience.
She closes the window. I wasn't paying attention anyway, I'm getting cold, and the birds are nowhere to be seen. I go inside.
Their voices are saying they haven't and shouldn't fuck but want to so bad, or have fucked and can't again but want to so bad, or something like that. Would this be easier if they were birds? Incel kind of question... I'm not following the conversation, but I'm still listening. He's talking in this slightly begging way. It's a way of talking that asks for pity, like he's already tried appealing to every other one of her sensibilities. Incel kind of observation... Maybe he just talks like that, in some upspeak derivative. Haha unless?
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
idk
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
your feed looks like my tumblr
or never left
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful
division of reality is straying away from it
so an active mazelike process
Better Lift
much more tactility
i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike
...
13 |
|
|
H |
|
|
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
. . . . |
|
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate