idk

isaac

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

propensity within someone

much more tactility

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

yeah

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

we can only engage in such a way

as in

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

not their contents

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

was it worth it

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

wait what is that

Lift Analysis

...

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

lol

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time