there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
your feed looks like my tumblr
to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so the method has to be autonomous
its performative
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
you know who you are. no more time, not like
1
. way too specific.and the fake qualifier
autonomy of learning
fw
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then
I wonder if the birds knew I was watching?
really i want the internet
hello reader,
feel you
lol yea
plato