autonomy of learning
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
ahnaf abrar
which magnetises chains of pins
so at the end
yeah
what do you mean
all that is to say
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
something religious, a kind of complex,
it will get lighter
, something washing, cleansing, revealing, etc.ion
division of reality is straying away from it
i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
plato
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
no i haven't really read anything
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.i dont understand magnetisation
I've found the girl, or she's found me, and we're smoking a cigarette while we watch the silhouettes of the French Raj and his fireworks bearer down on the bank.
somewhere between instagram and chatgpt
bro i read nothing in my life