lol yea
all that is to say
its good short few pages
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time
is everyoneback on tumblr now
propensity within someone
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
much more tactility
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
lol
i have read not even 1 book
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
as in
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
and the fake qualifier
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
yeah
magnetises a pin
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak