think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so the method has to be autonomous

what do you mean

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

yeah

we can only engage in such a way

isaac newton

i want to do that too

2 (actually index). two is company

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i love it here

what do you think my name is

not their contents

and the fake qualifier

We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.

I've found the girl, or she's found me, and we're smoking a cigarette while we watch the silhouettes of the French Raj and his fireworks bearer down on the bank.

i dont understand magnetisation

We look out over the river to a block of luxury flats built on the site of some old docks. It would be nice to live right there. Yes.

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

magnetisation/form

like magnets

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet