lol yea
you cannot feed someone truth
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
its performative
not their contents
as in
propensity within someone
autonomy of learning
whats your name?
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
have you read
you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak
isaac
isaac newton
was it worth it
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
no like which do people call me
so the method has to be autonomous
we can only engage in such a way
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
magnetises a pin
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
which magnetises chains of pins