lol yea

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

idk

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

yeah

no i haven't really read anything

as in

plato

much more tactility

not their contents

thank you

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

its good short few pages

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

whats your name?

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

autonomy of learning

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

so at the end

its good

i love it here

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

like magnets

what do you mean

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!

⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

it is hopeful