i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
which magnetises chains of pins
barren land
so the method has to be autonomous
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
much more tactility
idk
i have read not even 1 book
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
Lift Analysis
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
so at the end
Better Lift
with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
lol yea
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
as in
i see a website
I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation