there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

lol

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i have read not even 1 book

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

or never left

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

all that is to say

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

you cannot feed someone truth

not so on: yvf(wthw)

December 2025

whats your name?

was it worth it

send link

Thank you, Jack

Better Lift

isaac

autonomy of learning

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

like magnets

One of the birds shoots out of the tree.