okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

not their contents

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

so the method has to be autonomous

so an active mazelike process

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

magnetisation/form

all that is to say

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

we can only engage in such a way

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 21:22:59

lol

your feed looks like my tumblr

i see a website

IWGD

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

its performative

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

We gather around the start of a causeway down to the Thames. It's a pretty cold night and there's a breeze coming off the river.

autonomy of learning

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike