as in

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

magnetisation/form

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

division of reality is straying away from it

much more tactility

autonomy of learning

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

you cannot feed someone truth

that looks like my instagram account

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

was it worth it

and the fake qualifier

bro i read nothing in my life

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

and the fake qualifier

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

idk

yeah

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

i am quite illiterate on producing technology

"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."

no longer writing in the third person