i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i understand

so an active mazelike process

its good

so the method has to be autonomous

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

ion

sorry i am texting like a slav

yeah

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

no i haven't really read anything

yeah

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

idk

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

what do you mean

its performative

send your tumblr

like magnets

fw

It's

dusk

in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.
It bites my wrist but there is only a dull ache.
I feel that it wants to say sorry but can't. I die.

no like which do people call me

i am quite illiterate on producing technology