ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

what do you think my name is

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

is everyoneback on tumblr now

feel you

plato

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

is this you as well

autonomy of learning

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i love it here

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

that looks like my instagram account

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

lol

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

much more tactility

ahnaf abrar

propensity within someone

lol yea

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

was it worth it

and the fake qualifier

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

bro i read nothing in my life

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

we need to be deconstructing our identities

...

so at the end

not so on: yvf(wthw)

i want to do that too

the site i am dreaming

...

part of an old note. It will get lighter.

no like which do people call me