I am below everything.

something religious, a kind of complex,

it will get lighter

so the method has to be autonomous

propensity within someone

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

its performative

much more tactility

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

we need to be deconstructing our identities

have you read

in a post. I want to be remembered

Garden Post-Dusk, Birds Above, In Another Life

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

no i haven't really read anything

its good

autonomy of learning

And thank you for telling me that the manner in which the narrator consistently fails to act morally is really compelling. Fuck you.

isaac