my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:37:17

theres a kind of a cowardice to generative art that i want to avoid though. i want the kind of relationship to this thing that a game designer has to a game engine

Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:31:03

Imprint, memory, impact, representation, impression

autonomy of learning

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

division of reality is straying away from it

so the method has to be autonomous

no like which do people call me

like magnets

13, H, grate

but really the thing should be autonomous

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

is this you as well

god being the centre magnet

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

i want to do that too

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

magnetises a pin

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate