okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

as in

so at the end

its performative

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

magnetisation/form

your feed looks like my tumblr

lol

plato

propensity within someone

its good

much more tactility

so the method has to be autonomous

no i haven't really read anything

what do you think my name is

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

i have read not even 1 book

bro i read nothing in my life

send link

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

so an active mazelike process

what do you mean

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

have you read

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i really havent

way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason