ion
thank you
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
It's loud and he's gone deaf in one ear, so I don't think he's really hearing anything I'm trying to say. We're both pretty drunk too. It's making for a kind of surreal interactive Business Insider YouTube video of a conversation. He talks, waits for my response, sees my mouth moving but doesn't hear my words, then he imagines something in their place, and replies to that. At least I don't really have to do anything but drink and mime and listen to a lot of bullshit fake gangster talk, being an actor, boxing, the old days, blah blah blah.
a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it
Better Lift
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.your feed looks like my tumblr
isaac newton
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
It's
dusk
in a snowy forest and I'm playing with a fox.or never left
and the fake qualifier
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
plato
so the method has to be autonomous
Windrush Art Kid Oligarch
something for the future. something to look at when this is more. I've been thinking about... whatever
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i dont understand magnetisation
no i haven't really read anything
like magnets
you have a beautiful account btw
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them