there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

abrar?

its performative

is this you as well

what do you mean

sorry i am texting like a slav

no like which do people call me

i have read not even 1 book

much more tactility

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

yeah

there's probably something in that, but I don't feel like thinking about it too much yet.

I'm in a crowded lift and a girl I've never met tells me she thinks she might love me.
The lift won't stop at any floor, and I can't talk in front of all these people.

plato

so at the end

i am quite confused, not quite getting the idea of it

13, H, grate

Thank you, Jack

i dont understand magnetisation

i see a website though something that reconfigures or is mazelike

i love it here

so an active mazelike process

i was tempted to lie about my name

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:27:13

we want to live the knowledge too live the content