god being the centre magnet

autonomy of learning

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

all that is to say

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

we can only engage in such a way

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

propensity within someone

you cannot feed someone truth

so at the end

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

fw

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

barren land

division of reality is straying away from it

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

as in

its performative

your feed looks like my tumblr

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

not their contents

send link

i have read not even 1 book

was it worth it

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

the site i am dreaming

She closes the window. I wasn't paying attention anyway, I'm getting cold, and the birds are nowhere to be seen. I go inside.

Thank you, Jack