i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

...

so the method has to be autonomous

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

god being the centre magnet

isaac newton

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

its good short few pages

propensity within someone

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

have you read

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

magnetisation/form

i have read not even 1 book

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.

much more tactility

you know who you are. no more time, not like

1

. way too specific.

2 (actually index). two is company

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

idk

...

and the fake qualifier

that looks like my instagram account