there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i love it here

so the method has to be autonomous

was it worth it

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

its good

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

i dont understand magnetisation

your feed looks like my tumblr

what do you mean

plato

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

lol

but i respect your search

plato

feel you

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

really i want the internet

yes

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

Picture

and the fake qualifier

bro i read nothing in my life

Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46

it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!