i really havent
much more tactility
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
the site i am dreaming
so at the end
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
not their contents
we can only engage in such a way
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine
hello reader,
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
autonomy of learning
so an active mazelike process
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
They're fucking around with the box. I ask her what people do with fireworks for so long before they're ready to light. She doesn't know.
division of reality is straying away from it
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
...
Dreams like these are highly symbolic and emotionally intense. Here’s a breakdown of common interpretations:
the textwall is as much for me as it is for you
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetisation/form
currently
"Put a blanket."