okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
ahnaf abrar
magnetisation/form
you cannot feed someone truth
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
no like which do people call me
is this you as well
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
isaac
which magnetises chains of pins
we need to be deconstructing our identities
not their contents
thank you
i was tempted to lie about my name
its performative
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
god being the centre magnet
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
is everyoneback on tumblr now
or never left
bro i read nothing in my life
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
wait what is that
like first name
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
⚠️ Live Document Forever ⚠️
with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.
I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.