i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
we want to live the knowledge too live the content
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
all that is to say
we can only engage in such a way
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
was it worth it
plato
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
bro i read nothing in my life
like magnets
god "possessing" artists "possessing" people
i love it here
think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now
its performative
i want to do that too
Like the tide, it comes in and it washes over the beach. It's beautiful. But like the tide it goes out, sometimes it goes out further than it ever has, it recedes back across the beach and further out beyond the horizon. The bare seabed opens up in front of you and all you can do is look at it.
I've found the girl, or she's found me, and we're smoking a cigarette while we watch the silhouettes of the French Raj and his fireworks bearer down on the bank.
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
wait what is that
lol
and the fake qualifier
nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class
autonomy of learning
not so on: yvf(wthw)
way too random but already engaging. i want to explore it
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books