my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

idk

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so at the end

plato

no i haven't really read anything

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

ahnaf abrar

so the method has to be autonomous

is everyoneback on tumblr now

yeah

like magnets

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

isaac newton

isaac

i understand

its good short few pages

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i have read not even 1 book

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49

Can I see

        13       |
                |
                |
            H   |
                |
                |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
. . . .         |
                |

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate