there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
what do you think my name is
and the fake qualifier
you cannot feed someone truth
it holds me to something (you, now). I love editing!
all that is to say
ahnaf abrar
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
plato
...
not so on: yvf(wthw)
was it worth it
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
wait what is that
i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me
a heavy, heavy rain. a clear day.
I created this site
.