i really havent
i love it here
like first name
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
not their contents
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
you cannot feed someone truth
and the fake qualifier
sorry i am texting like a slav
as in
whats your name?
its good short few pages
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
have you read
plato
i dont understand magnetisation
I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
autonomy of learning
no i haven't really read anything
no like which do people call me