i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
and the fake qualifier
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
so the method has to be autonomous
autonomy of learning
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
so at the end
not their contents
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things
was it worth it
send your tumblr
i want to do that too
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
much more tactility
this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet
its good
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
no like which do people call me
thank you
we can only engage in such a way
plato
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away
we need to be deconstructing our identities
as in
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
what do you mean
sorry i am texting like a slav
or never left
like first name
I am below everything.
Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:31:03