we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so the method has to be autonomous

all that is to say

division of reality is straying away from it

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

whats your name?

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

send your tumblr

i love it here

plato

what do you think my name is

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

yeah

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

propensity within someone

i guess imagine a multimedia obsidian or notion that behaves according to some insane arcane rules that you can't ever really determine

feel you

i want to do that too

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

and the fake qualifier

i sat down to eat my peasant dinner but i thought it was a song you sent so i didn’t watch it then

no i haven't really read anything

a lot of what i've been doing has been some imaginary screenshot or recording of his website, something that could be found within it

i dont understand magnetisation

It Will Get Lighter