mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

isaac

propensity within someone

magnetisation/form

you cannot feed someone truth

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

not their contents

its performative

yeah

idk

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

i have read not even 1 book

fw

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

have you read

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

ion

what do you mean

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

i was tempted to lie about my name

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

sorry i am texting like a slav

isaac newton

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

like magnets

thank you

division of reality is straying away from it

ahnaf abrar

i really havent