ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying
what do you mean
its good
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you
lol
so the method has to be autonomous
ion
autonomy of learning
god being the centre magnet
or never left
yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
isaac newton
much more tactility
plato
the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book
send your tumblr
okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate
no like which do people call me
my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given
was it worth it
i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason
Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl