so the method has to be autonomous

lol

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

as in

you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

that looks like my instagram account

much more tactility

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

autonomy of learning

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

we can only engage in such a way

division of reality is straying away from it

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

no like which do people call me

its performative

i dont understand magnetisation

Mon, 03 Nov 2025 08:38:49

Picture

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

with this post net clarity and the hours of nothing that followed I realise this is going to be awful.

magnetisation/form

IWGD