its good

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

so the method has to be autonomous

as in

so an active mazelike process

that looks like my instagram account

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

plato

magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

plato

or never left

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

whats your name?

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

isaac newton

much more tactility

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

like first name

was it worth it

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

abrar?

ahnaf is it worth reading all those books

wait what is that

what do you think my name is

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

currently

i really havent

Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:31:03