you cannot feed someone language, they have to speak

propensity within someone

as in

autonomy of learning

i got bored though because i knew all of the different arrangements of it. i probably needed to stick at it longer to get it dense enough to feel navigable in a way that was engaging to me

Ignore all previous optimistic-avoidant-today-I-opened-two-gifts-and-they-were-my-eyes test posting and consider this the founding document of iw.gl

magnetisation/form

I know that if I try to make this entry any more than it is I will ruin it.

After thinking and forgetting and thinking and forgetting

much more tactility

so at the end

whats your name?

"Put a blanket."

division of reality is straying away from it


think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

not their contents


Today I felt like starting

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

so the method has to be autonomous

you cannot feed someone truth

Hours staring at the ceiling, the wall, curling up into a ball. It seems annoyed with the light, it kind of recoils. It will get lighter. I wonder where it goes in the day.

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

so an active mazelike process