much more tactility

all that is to say

we can only engage in such a way

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

i understand

ion

ahnaf abrar

is this you as well

so the method has to be autonomous

as in

autonomy of learning

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

we need to be deconstructing our identities

have you read

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

not their contents

bro i read nothing in my life

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

the only things i have read are just excerpts and 1 dialogue by plato fully and mcluhan's medium is the massage but it cannot be considered a book

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

barren land

idk

feel you

i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything

abrar?

plato

so at the end

thank you

its good short few pages

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things