feel you
in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation
i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate
like first name
ahnaf is it worth reading all those books
like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them
propensity within someone
not their contents
isaac newton
bro i read nothing in my life
which magnetises chains of pins
mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation
god being the centre magnet
i struggle with building a personal technical architecture for storing media, both curation and creation. instead i bookmark everything
i really havent
so an active mazelike process
there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.
and the fake qualifier
okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models
was it worth it
"I'm only attracted to you", he replies. "Like, you only."
Thu, 06 Nov 2025 23:18:46
amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting
much more tactility
She says something that isn't really right but isn't really wrong. I'm not taking in their words any more, just their voices, trying to get a feel for whatever is going on between them. I'm imagining what it's like for them in this delicate situation, what I would say if it were me. She has that perfect upper-class accent, and she's using whatever upper-class tact that comes with it to navigate this. Style. They can't be together, but their voices are betraying them.
i did until you asked which kind of gave it away