there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

feel you

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

so at the end

i was tempted to lie about my name

thank you

isaac newton

plato

i want to do that too

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

its performative

ion

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

like magnets

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

propensity within someone

yeah people dont get it they assume its ahnaf

you cannot feed someone truth

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

its good

so an active mazelike process

so the method has to be autonomous

ahnaf abrar

no i haven't really read anything

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

plato

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

December 2025

and the fake qualifier