there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

i really havent

is this you as well

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

i love it here

i don't really want to be associated with that one for some reason

propensity within someone

yeah

as in

i hadn't considered this pedagogically or as a kind of personal knowledge management system (puke) at all but i suppose it is both of those things

feel you

ahnaf abrar

much more tactility

thank you

its good short few pages

no i haven't really read anything

yes

what do you think my name is

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

brb i will read and reply sincerely

it exists in my head in some way that i'm trying to get out i lied on my story a little bit because i'm mostly feeling it and thinking about it. feeling something deeply doesn't necessitate any kind of deep relevance or whatever but the thinking is useful

you have a beautiful account btw

but i respect your search

stalgivc is the greatest poster of all time

so an active mazelike process

so magnetisation means the divine spirit acting thru u endowing you with its qualities

i know a little bit of lacan which probably influences me in a way i cant articulate

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

its good

so at the end

barren land