I am below everything.

i did until you asked which kind of gave it away

okay this is interesting because pedagogies we have rn are not proper models

like first name

i really havent

plato

ion

have you read

mazelike/rhizomatic/immanent/emergent are not antithetical to a transcendent real but its very manifestation

so at the end

fw

bro i read nothing in my life

think this is much more rhizomatic or immanent or mazelike than mainstream education now

i was tempted to lie about my name

all that is to say

nope. i only remember the leaves bristling behind the window during chemistry class

isaac

we can only engage in such a way

abrar?

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

we need to be deconstructing our identities

was it worth it

its performative

amazing hopefully this was all legible and frankly i might be going very off board but you seemed interesting

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

lol

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

magnetisation/form

which magnetises chains of pins

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet