magnetisation basically means the induction of divine form unto you

all that is to say

i haven't read 100 book s so i'm probably not getting the depth of all of what you're saying

okay im going very rogue and very inarticulate

send your tumblr

much more tactility

to work in time to get to the timeless, perfection thru chaos

this is possible in mazelike research sprints on the internet

i hope ai fixes this with the cessation of interfaces and walls

in a way what we are really interested in with pedagogy is the magnetisation

isaac

god "possessing" artists "possessing" people

whats your name?

not their contents

division of reality is straying away from it

magnetisation/form

no i haven't really read anything

like people can read 100 books and still not have the fire within them

isaac newton

my watchlater reached its limit years ago and now i have to create a playlist for each new topic im interested in but it is incredibly hard to create the taxonomy of knowledge because everything seems to be everything else because at the end it is what you get from it that matters not what is given

i dont understand magnetisation

lol yea

fw

there is a distinction between western-modern pedagogical systems that's like text-based as in a legal method but there is an idea of "pathshala" or "guru shissho"/ "porompora" i mean how masters relayed knowledge to the student by (oral) transmission often by memorising books. so what was taught was always interactive. knowledge was interactive, you spoke with people rather than read texts.

as in

but it is in my head and am i compelled to realise it, so it is my silmarillion, my tempelos

somewhere between instagram and chatgpt

i was tempted to lie about my name

we want to live the knowledge too live the content

i understand

or never left

what do you think my name is

Thank you, Jack